Maxim 8.2.16
The administration of an oath is an indispensable requisite to the formation of a legal jury.
Source: Lumsden v. City of Milwaukee, 8 Wis. 485, 486; Weisman, 67e
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Without the administration of an oath, no lawful jury is constituted — the oath is the foundation of the jury's authority and the guarantee of its fidelity.
Where this applies
- A criminal conviction is overturned because the jurors were never sworn in — without the oath, no lawful jury was ever formed.
- A defendant moves for a mistrial after discovering that the jury foreman was never administered the oath required by law.
- A civil verdict is vacated on appeal because the record shows the jury was seated and began deliberations without ever being sworn, making the entire proceeding invalid.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 8.2.16 — The administration of an oath is an indispensable requisite to the formation of a legal jury. — Lumsden v. City of Milwaukee, 8 Wis. 485, 486; Weisman, 67e
Found an error? Suggest a correction →