Maxim 8.2.17
There can be no valid trial jury of less than 12 men, and a consent even by the defendant to a trial by a less number is absolutely void.
Source: Hunt v. State, 61 Miss. 577, 580, 581; Weisman, 67g
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) The common law right to trial by jury means a jury of twelve — a trial by fewer than twelve is void, and no party's consent can validate what the law prohibits.
Where this applies
- A defendant convicted by an eight-person jury appeals, and the conviction is overturned because a valid jury requires twelve members.
- A judge asks if the defendant will agree to proceed with only eleven jurors after one falls ill, but the defense objects because even the defendant's consent cannot validate a jury of fewer than twelve.
- A state legislature passes a law allowing six-person juries in felony cases, and the law is struck down because the common-law right to a jury means twelve, period.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 8.2.17 — There can be no valid trial jury of less than 12 men, and a consent even by the defendant to a trial by a less number is absolutely void. — Hunt v. State, 61 Miss. 577, 580, 581; Weisman, 67g
Found an error? Suggest a correction →