Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 9.1.8

False in one thing, false in all things.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

Source: 4 Inst. 279; Broom, Max.; Jackson, Lat. for Lawyers, No. 266; Weisman, 26bb; Weisman, 37f Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational

Explanation

Where a witness is shown to have testified falsely on a material point — one on which he could not be presumed to be mistaken — the tribunal may reject the whole of his testimony.

Where this applies

  • A witness lied about one important detail so I want their entire testimony thrown out.
  • The other side's key witness got caught fabricating part of their story.
  • An expert witness was proven wrong on a major point so how can the rest of their testimony be trusted.

Legal domains

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 9.1.8 — False in one thing, false in all things. — 4 Inst. 279; Broom, Max.; Jackson, Lat. for Lawyers, No. 266; Weisman, 26bb; Weisman, 37f (Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →