Maxim 9.1.8
False in one thing, false in all things.
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
Source: 4 Inst. 279; Broom, Max.; Jackson, Lat. for Lawyers, No. 266; Weisman, 26bb; Weisman, 37f
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
Where a witness is shown to have testified falsely on a material point — one on which he could not be presumed to be mistaken — the tribunal may reject the whole of his testimony.
Where this applies
- A witness lied about one important detail so I want their entire testimony thrown out.
- The other side's key witness got caught fabricating part of their story.
- An expert witness was proven wrong on a major point so how can the rest of their testimony be trusted.
Topics
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 9.1.8 — False in one thing, false in all things. — 4 Inst. 279; Broom, Max.; Jackson, Lat. for Lawyers, No. 266; Weisman, 26bb; Weisman, 37f (Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →