Maxim 8.8.34
In nearly all penal judgments, immaturity of age and imbecility of mind are favored.
Source: Dig. 50, 17, 108; Broom, Max. 314; Weisman, 64kk
Difficulty 4/5 — Advanced
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) In criminal sentencing, youth and mental incapacity are treated as mitigating factors — the law extends greater leniency to those whose age or condition diminishes their culpability.
Where this applies
- A 14-year-old convicted of theft receives a lighter sentence than an adult would because the court takes his youth into account as a mitigating factor.
- A defendant with a severe intellectual disability is given a reduced sentence because his diminished mental capacity makes him less culpable.
- A juvenile offender is sentenced to a rehabilitation program instead of prison, because in penal judgments, immaturity of age is treated with leniency.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 8.8.34 — In nearly all penal judgments, immaturity of age and imbecility of mind are favored. — Dig. 50, 17, 108; Broom, Max. 314; Weisman, 64kk
Found an error? Suggest a correction →