Maxim 3.1.24
When the rights of the king and of the subject concur, those of the king are to be preferred.
Quando jus domini regis et subditi concurrunt jus regis praeferri debet.
Source: 9 Co. 129; Jackson
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
Where the sovereign and a subject hold competing claims to the same right or property, the sovereign's claim takes precedence — though in the American system this principle is constrained by the constitutional reservation of rights to the People.
Where this applies
- The federal government and a private landowner both claim title to the same parcel; under this maxim, the sovereign's claim takes priority, though the owner may seek just compensation.
- A state asserts its right to minerals beneath privately held land, and the court rules that where sovereign and private rights overlap, the sovereign's claim prevails.
- During wartime, the government requisitions a factory that a private party also has contractual rights to use; the government's need is held to take precedence, subject to constitutional limits.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 3.1.24 — When the rights of the king and of the subject concur, those of the king are to be preferred. — 9 Co. 129; Jackson (Quando jus domini regis et subditi concurrunt jus regis praeferri debet.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →