Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 3.1.23

Where one of two innocent persons must suffer by the wrong of another, the one who enables such other to commit the wrong must bear the consequences.

Source: Wharton, III-382 Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) When a third party's wrong injures one of two innocent persons, the loss falls on the one whose act or omission enabled the wrongdoer — invoke this to shift liability to the party who created the opportunity for the fraud or trespass.

Where this applies

  • A business owner leaves his car unlocked with the keys in the ignition; a thief steals it and crashes into a pedestrian, and the court holds the owner partly liable for enabling the theft.
  • A bank cashes a forged check because the account holder carelessly left signed blank checks where anyone could take them; the loss falls on the account holder who created the opportunity for the fraud.
  • A homeowner gives a spare key to an unlicensed contractor who then steals valuables; the court assigns liability to the homeowner who enabled access rather than to the innocent neighbor whose property was also damaged.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 3.1.23 — Where one of two innocent persons must suffer by the wrong of another, the one who enables such other to commit the wrong must bear the consequences. — Wharton, III-382

Found an error? Suggest a correction →