Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 10.4.2

A false description does not vitiate when the thing is sufficiently identified.

Falsa demonstratio non nocet, cum de corpore constat.

Source: 6 Term 676; 1 Greenl. Ev. §301; Broom, Max. 562, 629; Weisman, 31a; Weisman, 31d Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational

Explanation

Mere misdescription in a deed, will, or instrument does not invalidate it if the subject matter intended can be identified with certainty from the whole instrument.

Where this applies

  • The deed describes the property wrong but everyone knows which property is meant.
  • There's a misdescription in the will but the intended beneficiary is obvious.
  • A false description doesn't invalidate an instrument when the subject is clearly identified.

Legal domains

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 10.4.2 — A false description does not vitiate when the thing is sufficiently identified. — 6 Term 676; 1 Greenl. Ev. §301; Broom, Max. 562, 629; Weisman, 31a; Weisman, 31d (Falsa demonstratio non nocet, cum de corpore constat.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →