Maxim 10.4.2
A false description does not vitiate when the thing is sufficiently identified.
Falsa demonstratio non nocet, cum de corpore constat.
Source: 6 Term 676; 1 Greenl. Ev. §301; Broom, Max. 562, 629; Weisman, 31a; Weisman, 31d
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
Mere misdescription in a deed, will, or instrument does not invalidate it if the subject matter intended can be identified with certainty from the whole instrument.
Where this applies
- The deed describes the property wrong but everyone knows which property is meant.
- There's a misdescription in the will but the intended beneficiary is obvious.
- A false description doesn't invalidate an instrument when the subject is clearly identified.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 10.4.2 — A false description does not vitiate when the thing is sufficiently identified. — 6 Term 676; 1 Greenl. Ev. §301; Broom, Max. 562, 629; Weisman, 31a; Weisman, 31d (Falsa demonstratio non nocet, cum de corpore constat.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →