Maxim 10.4.3
He who distinguishes well, teaches well.
Qui bene distinguit, bene docet.
Source: 2 Inst. 470; Weisman, 31b
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
Clear reasoning in law depends upon making precise distinctions; the failure to distinguish things that differ leads to confusion and error.
Where this applies
- Good legal reasoning depends on making careful and precise distinctions.
- Failing to distinguish things that are actually different leads to confusion and error.
- Clear thinking requires knowing where the differences lie.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 10.4.3 — He who distinguishes well, teaches well. — 2 Inst. 470; Weisman, 31b (Qui bene distinguit, bene docet.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →