Maxim 8.1.15
Verbal quibbles are unworthy of a judge.
Aucupia verborum sunt judice indigna.
Source: Hob. 348
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
A judge who seizes upon technicalities of language to defeat the substance of a claim dishonors the bench. (Duplicate maxim — see also 10.2.29.)
Where this applies
- The judge dismissed my case because of a minor wording issue in my complaint.
- A court threw out a legitimate claim over a trivial language technicality.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 8.1.15 — Verbal quibbles are unworthy of a judge. — Hob. 348 (Aucupia verborum sunt judice indigna.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →