Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 8.1.15

Verbal quibbles are unworthy of a judge.

Aucupia verborum sunt judice indigna.

Source: Hob. 348 Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational

Explanation

A judge who seizes upon technicalities of language to defeat the substance of a claim dishonors the bench. (Duplicate maxim — see also 10.2.29.)

Where this applies

  • The judge dismissed my case because of a minor wording issue in my complaint.
  • A court threw out a legitimate claim over a trivial language technicality.

Legal domains

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 8.1.15 — Verbal quibbles are unworthy of a judge. — Hob. 348 (Aucupia verborum sunt judice indigna.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →