Maxim 4.6.13
He who condemns the precept condemns the party giving it.
Source: 12 Coke, 96; Weisman, 61k
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) To attack the authority of a command is to attack the one who issued it — cite this to argue that defiance of a lawful order is contempt of the authority behind it.
Where this applies
- A citizen publicly denounces a court order as unconstitutional; the judge holds him in contempt, reasoning that condemning the command is condemning the authority of the court that issued it.
- A soldier refuses to follow a general's order and openly ridicules it; the military tribunal treats the defiance as an affront to the general's authority itself, not merely a disagreement with the specific instruction.
- An employee publicly attacks a company policy and is terminated; the employer argues that by condemning the directive, the employee was effectively condemning the management that issued it.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 4.6.13 — He who condemns the precept condemns the party giving it. — 12 Coke, 96; Weisman, 61k
Found an error? Suggest a correction →