Maxim 4.6.12
Transactions between strangers may benefit, but cannot injure those who are not parties to them.
Source: 6 Coke, 1; Co. Litt. 132; Broom, Max. 954, 967; Weisman, 61j
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Contracts and transactions between third parties may incidentally benefit a non-party but can never impose a burden or obligation on him — cite this to defeat a claim that a stranger to an agreement is bound by its terms.
Where this applies
- Two companies sign a supply contract that incidentally lowers prices for a third-party retailer; the retailer benefits, but neither company can use the contract to impose obligations on the retailer who was not a party.
- A settlement between a manufacturer and a distributor includes a non-compete clause; a competing distributor who was not party to the agreement cannot be bound by its terms.
- A landlord and tenant agree to a lease modification that happens to improve a neighbor's parking access; the neighbor benefits, but the lease cannot impose any new duty on him because he is a stranger to the agreement.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 4.6.12 — Transactions between strangers may benefit, but cannot injure those who are not parties to them. — 6 Coke, 1; Co. Litt. 132; Broom, Max. 954, 967; Weisman, 61j
Found an error? Suggest a correction →