Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 10.2.15

That is uselessly done by more words which may be done by fewer.

Frustra fit per plura, quod fieri potest per pauciora.

Source: Jenk. 61; Jackson Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational

Explanation

Brevity is preferred in legal instruments; unnecessary verbiage adds nothing and may obscure the operative terms.

Where this applies

  • The contract uses way more words than necessary to say something simple.
  • Brevity is better — why use fifty words when ten will do.
  • Unnecessary verbiage in legal documents just creates confusion.

Legal domains

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 10.2.15 — That is uselessly done by more words which may be done by fewer. — Jenk. 61; Jackson (Frustra fit per plura, quod fieri potest per pauciora.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →