Maxim 10.2.15
That is uselessly done by more words which may be done by fewer.
Frustra fit per plura, quod fieri potest per pauciora.
Source: Jenk. 61; Jackson
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
Brevity is preferred in legal instruments; unnecessary verbiage adds nothing and may obscure the operative terms.
Where this applies
- The contract uses way more words than necessary to say something simple.
- Brevity is better — why use fifty words when ten will do.
- Unnecessary verbiage in legal documents just creates confusion.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 10.2.15 — That is uselessly done by more words which may be done by fewer. — Jenk. 61; Jackson (Frustra fit per plura, quod fieri potest per pauciora.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →