Maxim 9.2.11
The form of taking an oath, though it differs in words, agrees in meaning; for it ought to have this sense, that the Deity be invoked.
Jusjurandi forma verbis differt, re convenit; hunc enim sensum habere debet, ut Deus invocetur.
Source: Grotius, l. 2, c. 13, §10; Wharton; Weisman, 84m
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
The particular words of an oath may vary by custom or jurisdiction, but the substance is universal — every lawful oath must invoke the Almighty as witness to the truth of what is sworn.
Where this applies
- The oath was taken in a different form than what's traditional but it still invoked God.
- Someone objects to the wording of an oath even though the meaning was the same.
- An oath was valid in substance even though the exact words were non-standard.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 9.2.11 — The form of taking an oath, though it differs in words, agrees in meaning; for it ought to have this sense, that the Deity be invoked. — Grotius, l. 2, c. 13, §10; Wharton; Weisman, 84m (Jusjurandi forma verbis differt, re convenit; hunc enim sensum habere debet, ut Deus invocetur.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →