Maxim 9.1.28
Report, which induces suspicion, ought to arise from good and grave men; not, indeed, from malevolent and malicious men, but from cautious and credible persons; not only once, but frequently; for clamor diminishes, and defamation manifests.
Source: 2 Inst. 52; Black's, 2d. 482; Weisman, 39cc
Difficulty 4/5 — Advanced
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Rumor and report that would justify investigation must originate from credible, disinterested persons and must be persistent — isolated accusations from hostile witnesses do not constitute lawful grounds for suspicion.
Where this applies
- A single anonymous tip from a person with a grudge against the suspect is not enough to justify a search warrant — suspicion must arise from credible, disinterested sources.
- Multiple respected community members independently report the same concern about a business to the health department — that consistent, credible pattern justifies an investigation.
- A disgruntled ex-employee files one complaint, but no one else corroborates the claim — the court finds the lone, motivated accusation insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 9.1.28 — Report, which induces suspicion, ought to arise from good and grave men; not, indeed, from malevolent and malicious men, but from cautious and credible persons; not only once, but frequently; for clamor diminishes, and defamation manifests. — 2 Inst. 52; Black's, 2d. 482; Weisman, 39cc
Found an error? Suggest a correction →