Maxim 7.2.25
Fraud is always positive or intentional and distinguished from negligence.
Source: Alexander v. Church, 53 Conn. 561; 4 Atl. 103; 53 Conn; Weisman, 29v
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Fraud requires a deliberate act of deception — it is always affirmative and intentional, and must be distinguished from mere carelessness or negligence.
Where this applies
- A surgeon accidentally nicks an artery during a routine procedure — that is negligence, not fraud, because there was no intent to deceive.
- A bookkeeper who miscalculates a tax return by honest mistake is negligent, but one who deliberately falsifies numbers to steal money commits fraud.
- An insurance adjuster who carelessly undervalues a claim is negligent, but one who intentionally lowballs it to pocket the difference is committing fraud.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 7.2.25 — Fraud is always positive or intentional and distinguished from negligence. — Alexander v. Church, 53 Conn. 561; 4 Atl. 103; 53 Conn; Weisman, 29v
Found an error? Suggest a correction →