Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 3.6.22

The law judges a man's previous intentions by his subsequent acts.

Source: Wharton, III-339 Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) A man's earlier intentions are illuminated by his later deeds — invoke this maxim to demonstrate that subsequent conduct confirms or contradicts the intent claimed at the time of the original act.

Where this applies

  • A contractor claims he always intended to complete the renovation, but his subsequent act of abandoning the job site and taking another contract proves his original intent was not genuine.
  • A borrower says she fully intended to repay the loan, but her subsequent transfer of all assets to a relative's name reveals that her true plan was to avoid the debt.
  • A politician claims he supported the bill from the start, but his subsequent vote against it and public opposition show his earlier stated intentions were not sincere.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 3.6.22 — The law judges a man's previous intentions by his subsequent acts. — Wharton, III-339

Found an error? Suggest a correction →