Maxim 3.4.14
By reasoning we come to true reason.
Source: Litt. s. 386; Weisman, 69b
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Sound legal reasoning, carefully applied, leads to correct conclusions. Courts and advocates must reason from established principles rather than from assumptions or speculation.
Where this applies
- A judge requires both sides to build their arguments from established precedent rather than speculation, because only careful reasoning from known principles leads to sound conclusions.
- An appellate court overturns a trial judge's ruling that was based on gut feeling rather than legal analysis, holding that true reason comes through disciplined reasoning.
- A law professor teaches students to trace every conclusion back to a statutory or constitutional source, because reasoned argument — not assertion — is how the law arrives at truth.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 3.4.14 — By reasoning we come to true reason. — Litt. s. 386; Weisman, 69b
Found an error? Suggest a correction →