Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 3.4.14

By reasoning we come to true reason.

Source: Litt. s. 386; Weisman, 69b Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) Sound legal reasoning, carefully applied, leads to correct conclusions. Courts and advocates must reason from established principles rather than from assumptions or speculation.

Where this applies

  • A judge requires both sides to build their arguments from established precedent rather than speculation, because only careful reasoning from known principles leads to sound conclusions.
  • An appellate court overturns a trial judge's ruling that was based on gut feeling rather than legal analysis, holding that true reason comes through disciplined reasoning.
  • A law professor teaches students to trace every conclusion back to a statutory or constitutional source, because reasoned argument — not assertion — is how the law arrives at truth.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 3.4.14 — By reasoning we come to true reason. — Litt. s. 386; Weisman, 69b

Found an error? Suggest a correction →