Maxim 2.2.4
No one can do indirectly what he cannot do directly.
Nemo potest facere per obliquum quod non potest facere per directum.
Source: 1 Inst. 56; Broom, Max. 347; Weisman, 2y
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
A government that lacks authority to regulate a right directly cannot use licensing, taxation, or contract to achieve the same result by indirection. The foundation of the unconstitutional conditions doctrine.
Where this applies
- The government cannot ban homeschooling directly so it requires permits that are impossible to obtain.
- A city cannot outlaw a business directly so it zones it out of existence.
Topics
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 2.2.4 — No one can do indirectly what he cannot do directly. — 1 Inst. 56; Broom, Max. 347; Weisman, 2y (Nemo potest facere per obliquum quod non potest facere per directum.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →