Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 12.5.2

The useful is not vitiated by the useless.

Utile per inutile non vitiatur.

Source: Dyer 392; Broom, Max. 627; Dig. 50, 17, 94; Weisman, 62h Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational

Explanation

Surplus or unnecessary language in a deed, statute, or pleading does not destroy the operative and valid portions — the good survives the waste.

Where this applies

  • There's unnecessary language in the document but the important parts are still valid.
  • Surplus words don't destroy the operative provisions.
  • The useful survives the useless — good provisions aren't ruined by accompanying waste.

Legal domains

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 12.5.2 — The useful is not vitiated by the useless. — Dyer 392; Broom, Max. 627; Dig. 50, 17, 94; Weisman, 62h (Utile per inutile non vitiatur.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →