Maxim 11.3.6
Surplusage does no harm.
Superflua non nocent.
Source: 3 Bouv. Inst. no. 2949; Broom, Max. 627; Jenk. Cent. 184; Weisman, 41c; Weisman, 41e
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
Unnecessary words in a deed or statute do not invalidate it — the good part stands even if accompanied by surplus language.
Where this applies
- The contract has unnecessary language but the important parts are valid.
- Extra words in the deed don't invalidate the operative provisions.
- Surplus language does no harm — the good part stands regardless.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 11.3.6 — Surplusage does no harm. — 3 Bouv. Inst. no. 2949; Broom, Max. 627; Jenk. Cent. 184; Weisman, 41c; Weisman, 41e (Superflua non nocent.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →