Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 9.1.21

Proof is the effect of evidence; the establishment of a fact by evidence.

Source: Tift v. Jones, 77 Ga. 181; 3 S.E. 399; Weisman, 39d Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) Proof is not the evidence itself but the conclusion the evidence establishes; counsel should distinguish between offering evidence and actually proving the fact at issue.

Where this applies

  • A prosecutor presents ten witness statements and three documents but the jury still isn't convinced the defendant committed the crime — the evidence was offered, but proof (the conclusion the evidence is supposed to produce) was never achieved.
  • A party submits a stack of financial records to show damages, but the records are so disorganized that the judge can't determine the actual loss — the evidence exists, but proof hasn't been established.
  • A lawyer introduces a signed contract into evidence, and that single document is enough to prove the agreement existed — here the evidence directly produces the proof.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 9.1.21 — Proof is the effect of evidence; the establishment of a fact by evidence. — Tift v. Jones, 77 Ga. 181; 3 S.E. 399; Weisman, 39d

Found an error? Suggest a correction →