Maxim 9.1.21
Proof is the effect of evidence; the establishment of a fact by evidence.
Source: Tift v. Jones, 77 Ga. 181; 3 S.E. 399; Weisman, 39d
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Proof is not the evidence itself but the conclusion the evidence establishes; counsel should distinguish between offering evidence and actually proving the fact at issue.
Where this applies
- A prosecutor presents ten witness statements and three documents but the jury still isn't convinced the defendant committed the crime — the evidence was offered, but proof (the conclusion the evidence is supposed to produce) was never achieved.
- A party submits a stack of financial records to show damages, but the records are so disorganized that the judge can't determine the actual loss — the evidence exists, but proof hasn't been established.
- A lawyer introduces a signed contract into evidence, and that single document is enough to prove the agreement existed — here the evidence directly produces the proof.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 9.1.21 — Proof is the effect of evidence; the establishment of a fact by evidence. — Tift v. Jones, 77 Ga. 181; 3 S.E. 399; Weisman, 39d
Found an error? Suggest a correction →