Maxim 9.1.12
One eye-witness is worth more than ten ear-witnesses.
Pluris est oculatus testis unus quam auriti decem.
Source: 4 Inst. 279; 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3154; Weisman, 39w
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
Direct observation outweighs hearsay; testimony from one who saw the event firsthand carries greater weight than any number of those who merely heard of it.
Where this applies
- I have one person who saw what happened but the other side has ten people who only heard about it secondhand.
- They're bringing in lots of people who weren't even there but my witness actually saw the event.
- The court is giving equal weight to hearsay witnesses and someone who directly observed the incident.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 9.1.12 — One eye-witness is worth more than ten ear-witnesses. — 4 Inst. 279; 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3154; Weisman, 39w (Pluris est oculatus testis unus quam auriti decem.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →