Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 8.8.23

Every conclusion of a good and true judgment arises from good and true premises, and sayings of juries.

Omnis conclusio boni et veri judicii sequitur ex bonis et veris praemissis et dictis juratorum.

Source: Co. Litt. 226; Jackson; Weisman, 64gg Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable

Explanation

Sound judgments rest on sound foundations — a just conclusion can only follow from truthful premises established by the jury's findings of fact.

Where this applies

  • A murder conviction is overturned on appeal when it is discovered that the key forensic evidence presented to the jury was fabricated — the verdict could not stand because a good judgment can only arise from true premises, and the jury's findings were built on lies.
  • A civil jury awards damages based on an expert witness's testimony that is later proven to be completely false — the judgment is vacated because sound conclusions require truthful foundations, and the jury was misled.
  • A judge directs a verdict based on stipulated facts that both parties later admit were inaccurate — the judgment must be revisited because every just conclusion depends on good and true premises being established first.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 8.8.23 — Every conclusion of a good and true judgment arises from good and true premises, and sayings of juries. — Co. Litt. 226; Jackson; Weisman, 64gg (Omnis conclusio boni et veri judicii sequitur ex bonis et veris praemissis et dictis juratorum.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →