Maxim 8.7.11
A plea of a matter of which a dissolution is sought by the action is null.
Source: Jenk. Cent. 37, case 71; Bacon, Max. reg. 2; Weisman, 87a
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) When a suit seeks to dissolve or annul a matter, the defendant cannot plead that very matter in bar — the thing sought to be destroyed cannot serve as its own shield.
Where this applies
- A tenant sues to void a lease obtained by fraud, and the landlord cannot use that same lease as a defense — the thing being dissolved cannot shield itself.
- A shareholder sues to annul a corporate merger, and the merged company cannot plead the merger as a bar to the lawsuit.
- A party sues to rescind a contract, and the other side cannot use the contract's arbitration clause as a defense because the very validity of the contract is what is being challenged.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 8.7.11 — A plea of a matter of which a dissolution is sought by the action is null. — Jenk. Cent. 37, case 71; Bacon, Max. reg. 2; Weisman, 87a
Found an error? Suggest a correction →