Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 8.7.11

A plea of a matter of which a dissolution is sought by the action is null.

Source: Jenk. Cent. 37, case 71; Bacon, Max. reg. 2; Weisman, 87a Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) When a suit seeks to dissolve or annul a matter, the defendant cannot plead that very matter in bar — the thing sought to be destroyed cannot serve as its own shield.

Where this applies

  • A tenant sues to void a lease obtained by fraud, and the landlord cannot use that same lease as a defense — the thing being dissolved cannot shield itself.
  • A shareholder sues to annul a corporate merger, and the merged company cannot plead the merger as a bar to the lawsuit.
  • A party sues to rescind a contract, and the other side cannot use the contract's arbitration clause as a defense because the very validity of the contract is what is being challenged.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 8.7.11 — A plea of a matter of which a dissolution is sought by the action is null. — Jenk. Cent. 37, case 71; Bacon, Max. reg. 2; Weisman, 87a

Found an error? Suggest a correction →