Maxim 7.4.30
An injury offered to a judge, or person representing the king, is considered as offered to the king himself, especially if it be done in the exercise of his office.
Injuria illata judici, seu locum tenenti regis, videtur ipsi regi illata, maxime si fiat in exercente officium.
Source: 3 Inst. 1; Jackson
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
An affront to a judicial officer acting in his official capacity is treated as an affront to the sovereign authority he represents — contempt of the officer is contempt of the law itself.
Where this applies
- A man who punches a judge in the middle of a court hearing is charged with contempt of the sovereign authority the judge represents, not just simple assault.
- A protester who throws objects at a police officer acting in her official capacity is treated as having attacked the authority of the state itself.
- Threatening a government official while they are carrying out their lawful duties is treated more seriously than a private threat, because the affront is to the office, not just the person.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 7.4.30 — An injury offered to a judge, or person representing the king, is considered as offered to the king himself, especially if it be done in the exercise of his office. — 3 Inst. 1; Jackson (Injuria illata judici, seu locum tenenti regis, videtur ipsi regi illata, maxime si fiat in exercente officium.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →