Maxim 7.3.3
A poisonous gloss is one which corrupts the substance of the text.
Glossa venenata est quae corrumpit viscera textus.
Source: 11 Coke, 34; Weisman, 25c
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
An interpretation that twists a law's plain meaning to serve corrupt purposes destroys the law itself — the corruption of the text is worse than ignoring it entirely.
Where this applies
- A legal commentator is twisting the plain meaning of a statute to justify a government overreach.
- An attorney general reinterpreted a clear constitutional provision to expand government power.
Topics
Legal domains
See also
- 7.3.1 That which is bad in its beginning does not improve by lapse of time.
- 10.1.1 Liberal constructions of written instruments are to be made, on account of the simplicity of the common people, so that the thing may have effect rather than perish; and words should serve the intention, not the intention the words.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 7.3.3 — A poisonous gloss is one which corrupts the substance of the text. — 11 Coke, 34; Weisman, 25c (Glossa venenata est quae corrumpit viscera textus.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →