Maxim 7.1.4
In more atrocious crimes, the intent is punished even though the effect does not follow.
In atrocioribus delictis punitur affectus licet non sequatur effectus.
Source: 2 Rolle 82; Weisman, 26l
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
The more serious the intended crime, the more the law focuses on the criminal purpose rather than whether harm was actually accomplished.
Where this applies
- Someone attempted to assassinate a public official but failed — should the punishment reflect the intent?
- A person planted a bomb that didn't go off — is the attempt enough for serious charges?
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 7.1.4 — In more atrocious crimes, the intent is punished even though the effect does not follow. — 2 Rolle 82; Weisman, 26l (In atrocioribus delictis punitur affectus licet non sequatur effectus.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →