Maxim 6.5.17
A delegated debtor is hateful in law.
Source: 3 Bulstr. 148; Weisman, 28e
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) The law disfavors the delegation of debts — substituting a new debtor in place of the original is viewed with suspicion and requires clear proof of the creditor's consent.
Where this applies
- A creditor agrees to let a new party take over the original debtor's obligation, but the court requires clear proof that the creditor actually consented to the substitution.
- A landlord claims a new tenant assumed the old tenant's lease, but the law requires proof that the landlord agreed to release the original tenant and accept the new one.
- A bank transfers a loan obligation from one borrower to another, but the original borrower is not released unless the bank explicitly consented to the delegation.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 6.5.17 — A delegated debtor is hateful in law. — 3 Bulstr. 148; Weisman, 28e
Found an error? Suggest a correction →