Maxim 5.5.8
No rule of law protects a buyer who willfully closes his ears to information, or refuses to make inquiry when circumstances of grave suspicion imperatively demand it.
Nulla juris regula protegit emptorem qui voluntarie aures claudit.
Source: Lytly v. Lansing, 147 U.S. 59, 72; Weisman, 13s
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
The buyer who refuses to investigate what a reasonable man would suspect forfeits the law's protection — willful blindness is no better than knowledge.
Where this applies
- I bought a property at a suspiciously low price and didn't bother to investigate why.
- I knew there might be title issues but went ahead with the purchase anyway.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 5.5.8 — No rule of law protects a buyer who willfully closes his ears to information, or refuses to make inquiry when circumstances of grave suspicion imperatively demand it. — Lytly v. Lansing, 147 U.S. 59, 72; Weisman, 13s (Nulla juris regula protegit emptorem qui voluntarie aures claudit.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →