Maxim 5.1.40
He who has fraudulently dispossessed himself of a thing may be treated as if he still had possession.
Qui dolo desierit possidere, pro possidente damnatur.
Source: Wharton, III-B-9
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
A person who fraudulently divests himself of possession of property may still be treated as if he retained it. This prevents a wrongdoer from evading an action for recovery by voluntarily parting with possession before suit is brought.
Where this applies
- A debtor transfers his house to a relative right before a creditor files suit, and the court treats him as if he still owns the house because the transfer was fraudulent.
- A man gives away all his assets to a shell company he controls just before a lawsuit, and the court pierces the transfer and treats him as still possessing those assets.
- A business owner sells her inventory to a friend at a suspiciously low price to hide it from a judgment creditor, and the law treats her as if she still has it.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 5.1.40 — He who has fraudulently dispossessed himself of a thing may be treated as if he still had possession. — Wharton, III-B-9 (Qui dolo desierit possidere, pro possidente damnatur.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →