Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 3.2.17

Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential.

Source: Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47, 58; Weisman, 81e Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) Initials alone are legally insufficient to identify a person — the full Christian name must appear in process, indictments, and conveyances, and the use of initials where the full name was required may be grounds to quash.

Where this applies

  • A deed is executed by "J. R. Smith" without ever stating the grantor's full Christian name; the grantee challenges title because initials alone are legally insufficient identification.
  • An indictment charges "T. Williams" with a felony, but the defense moves to quash it because the full first name is required to properly identify the accused.
  • A court filing lists a party only as "R. M. Davis"; opposing counsel objects that initials are no legal part of a name and demands the full name be provided.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 3.2.17 — Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential. — Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47, 58; Weisman, 81e

Found an error? Suggest a correction →