Maxim 3.2.17
Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential.
Source: Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47, 58; Weisman, 81e
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Initials alone are legally insufficient to identify a person — the full Christian name must appear in process, indictments, and conveyances, and the use of initials where the full name was required may be grounds to quash.
Where this applies
- A deed is executed by "J. R. Smith" without ever stating the grantor's full Christian name; the grantee challenges title because initials alone are legally insufficient identification.
- An indictment charges "T. Williams" with a felony, but the defense moves to quash it because the full first name is required to properly identify the accused.
- A court filing lists a party only as "R. M. Davis"; opposing counsel objects that initials are no legal part of a name and demands the full name be provided.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 3.2.17 — Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential. — Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47, 58; Weisman, 81e
Found an error? Suggest a correction →