A name is not sufficient if a thing or subject for it does not exist by law or by fact.

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) A name in a legal instrument is void if there is no corresponding person or thing in law or in fact — cite this to challenge a grant, bequest, or charge directed to a nonexistent entity.

Where this applies

• A will leaves property to the "First National Trust of Springfield," but no such entity has ever existed in law or in fact; the court voids the bequest for lack of a valid beneficiary.
• A contract names a party called "Acme Holdings LLC" that was never formed or registered; the agreement is unenforceable because the named entity does not exist.
• A zoning ordinance restricts building on land designated as "Riverview Park District," but no such district was ever legally created, so the restriction has no force.