Maxim 3.1.17
Capacity relates to soundness of mind or a mind that has full and intelligent knowledge of an act engaged in.
Source: In re Null's Estate, 153 A. 137, 139, 302 Pa. 64; Weisman, 76m
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) When challenging the validity of a contract, deed, or will, invoke this maxim to argue that the party lacked the mental competence to understand the nature and consequences of the act.
Where this applies
- An elderly man signs over his house to a caretaker, but his children argue he had advanced dementia and lacked the mental capacity to understand what he was doing.
- A party to a contract claims it is void because she was heavily medicated at the time of signing and had no intelligent knowledge of the terms she agreed to.
- A court invalidates a will after medical testimony shows the testator could not comprehend the nature or extent of his property when he executed it.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 3.1.17 — Capacity relates to soundness of mind or a mind that has full and intelligent knowledge of an act engaged in. — In re Null's Estate, 153 A. 137, 139, 302 Pa. 64; Weisman, 76m
Found an error? Suggest a correction →