Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 3.1.17

Capacity relates to soundness of mind or a mind that has full and intelligent knowledge of an act engaged in.

Source: In re Null's Estate, 153 A. 137, 139, 302 Pa. 64; Weisman, 76m Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) When challenging the validity of a contract, deed, or will, invoke this maxim to argue that the party lacked the mental competence to understand the nature and consequences of the act.

Where this applies

  • An elderly man signs over his house to a caretaker, but his children argue he had advanced dementia and lacked the mental capacity to understand what he was doing.
  • A party to a contract claims it is void because she was heavily medicated at the time of signing and had no intelligent knowledge of the terms she agreed to.
  • A court invalidates a will after medical testimony shows the testator could not comprehend the nature or extent of his property when he executed it.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 3.1.17 — Capacity relates to soundness of mind or a mind that has full and intelligent knowledge of an act engaged in. — In re Null's Estate, 153 A. 137, 139, 302 Pa. 64; Weisman, 76m

Found an error? Suggest a correction →