Maxim 2.4.32
It is allowable to kill a thief if he cannot otherwise be taken.
Surem, si aliter capi non posset, occidere permittunt.
Source: Weisman, 77b
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
At common law, deadly force was permitted against a thief who could not be apprehended by lesser means — the right to protect property extended to lethal defense when no alternative existed.
Where this applies
- A homeowner discovers a burglar in her house at night and uses lethal force to defend her family when the burglar charges at her, invoking the common-law right to kill a thief who cannot otherwise be taken.
- A shopkeeper confronts an armed robber who refuses to surrender and attempts to flee with the goods, and the common-law rule permits the use of necessary force to apprehend the thief.
- A farmer encounters a cattle rustler on his property in a remote area with no law enforcement available, and the historical common-law principle permitted the use of deadly force as a last resort when the thief could not be captured by other means.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 2.4.32 — It is allowable to kill a thief if he cannot otherwise be taken. — Weisman, 77b (Surem, si aliter capi non posset, occidere permittunt.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →