Maxim 10.4.11
A description which distinguishes it from any other, although a better description might be given, is all that is required.
Source: Matson v. Hurd, 14 U.S. 130, 138; Weisman, 31j
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) A description need only be sufficient to identify the thing uniquely — perfection is not required, only distinctiveness.
Where this applies
- A deed describes the land well enough to identify it, even though a surveyor could have been more precise.
- A contract identifies the goods clearly enough to tell them apart from all others, and that suffices.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 10.4.11 — A description which distinguishes it from any other, although a better description might be given, is all that is required. — Matson v. Hurd, 14 U.S. 130, 138; Weisman, 31j
Found an error? Suggest a correction →