Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 10.4.11

A description which distinguishes it from any other, although a better description might be given, is all that is required.

Source: Matson v. Hurd, 14 U.S. 130, 138; Weisman, 31j

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) A description need only be sufficient to identify the thing uniquely — perfection is not required, only distinctiveness.

Where this applies

  • A deed describes the land well enough to identify it, even though a surveyor could have been more precise.
  • A contract identifies the goods clearly enough to tell them apart from all others, and that suffices.

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 10.4.11 — A description which distinguishes it from any other, although a better description might be given, is all that is required. — Matson v. Hurd, 14 U.S. 130, 138; Weisman, 31j

Found an error? Suggest a correction →