In ambiguous cases, that which is least inconvenient is always to be done.

Explanation

When both readings of an ambiguous instrument are plausible, the court adopts the one that avoids the greater practical harm.

Where this applies

• Both readings of this ambiguous clause are plausible but one would cause much less harm.
• When both interpretations are possible, choose the one with fewer bad consequences.
• In an ambiguous situation, the least inconvenient option should be followed.

See also

• 10.1.5 Interpretation is always to be made so that what is absurd and inconvenient may be avoided.
• 10.3.2 In an ambiguous expression of law, that meaning is to be preferred which is consonant with equity, especially when the spirit of the law can be gathered from it.