Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 10.3.14

Ambiguity is doubtfulness; doubleness of meaning.

Source: Chapman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 173 S.E. 801, 803, 172 S.C. 250; Weisman, 6i Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) Ambiguity exists wherever language is susceptible of two or more reasonable meanings — it is doubtfulness or doubleness of sense that opens the door to construction.

Where this applies

  • A contract says the seller will deliver "the product" but the seller manufactures three different products — the word "product" is ambiguous because it could reasonably refer to any of them.
  • A deed grants "the property on Main Street" to a buyer, but the grantor owns two lots on Main Street — there's a genuine doubleness of meaning that must be resolved.
  • An insurance policy covers "accidents" but doesn't define whether that includes the policyholder's own negligence — the term is ambiguous because it can reasonably be read either way.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 10.3.14 — Ambiguity is doubtfulness; doubleness of meaning. — Chapman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 173 S.E. 801, 803, 172 S.C. 250; Weisman, 6i

Found an error? Suggest a correction →