Maxim 10.3.14
Ambiguity is doubtfulness; doubleness of meaning.
Source: Chapman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 173 S.E. 801, 803, 172 S.C. 250; Weisman, 6i
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Ambiguity exists wherever language is susceptible of two or more reasonable meanings — it is doubtfulness or doubleness of sense that opens the door to construction.
Where this applies
- A contract says the seller will deliver "the product" but the seller manufactures three different products — the word "product" is ambiguous because it could reasonably refer to any of them.
- A deed grants "the property on Main Street" to a buyer, but the grantor owns two lots on Main Street — there's a genuine doubleness of meaning that must be resolved.
- An insurance policy covers "accidents" but doesn't define whether that includes the policyholder's own negligence — the term is ambiguous because it can reasonably be read either way.
Legal domains
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 10.3.14 — Ambiguity is doubtfulness; doubleness of meaning. — Chapman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 173 S.E. 801, 803, 172 S.C. 250; Weisman, 6i
Found an error? Suggest a correction →