Maxim 10.3.1
An ambiguous answer is to be taken against him who offers it.
Ambigua responsio contra proferentem est accipienda.
Source: 10 Co. 58, 59; Broom, Max. 594; Weisman, 6a
Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational
Explanation
He who speaks ambiguously when he could have spoken plainly has only himself to blame; the doubt is resolved against him.
Where this applies
- The other side gave an ambiguous answer when they could have been clear — it should be read against them.
- They worded their response vaguely on purpose and now the doubt should fall on them.
- If you speak ambiguously when you could speak plainly, the ambiguity works against you.
Topics
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 10.3.1 — An ambiguous answer is to be taken against him who offers it. — 10 Co. 58, 59; Broom, Max. 594; Weisman, 6a (Ambigua responsio contra proferentem est accipienda.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →