That interpretation is to be received [or adopted] which is free from fault [or wrong.] The law will not intend a wrong.

Explanation

(English-origin maxim.) Among competing interpretations, the one free from wrong or absurdity must be adopted; the law will not intend an unjust result when a just reading is available.

Where this applies

• A statute could be read to either allow or prohibit the government from seizing private land without compensation — the court adopts the reading that prohibits the seizure, because the law will not intend a wrong.
• A trust document has two possible interpretations: one would disinherit a child entirely by accident, the other gives each beneficiary a fair share — the court picks the fair reading.
• An ambiguous contract clause could mean either that the seller keeps defective goods and the money, or that the buyer gets a refund — the court adopts the reading that doesn't reward the seller for delivering junk.