Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 10.1.20

The laws consist not in being read, but in being understood.

Non in legendo sed in intelligendo leges consistunt.

Source: 8 Co. 167; Bouvier Difficulty 1/5 — Foundational

Explanation

Mere recitation of the text is insufficient — the law demands comprehension of meaning, purpose, and effect.

Where this applies

  • Simply reading the text of the law isn't enough — you have to understand what it means.
  • Knowing the words of a statute without grasping its purpose is useless.
  • The law demands comprehension, not just recitation.

Legal domains

interpretation

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 10.1.20 — The laws consist not in being read, but in being understood. — 8 Co. 167; Bouvier (Non in legendo sed in intelligendo leges consistunt.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →