Maxim 1.7.18
The law would rather tolerate a private loss than a public evil.
Lex citius tolerare vult privatum damnum quam publicum malum.
Source: Co. Litt. 152
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
Between private hardship and public harm, the law accepts the former to prevent the latter — but this is a principle of last resort, not a license to sacrifice individual rights at will. In the American system, this principle is bounded by the Bill of Rights — no public interest can destroy a secured right.
Where this applies
- An individual suffers a loss to prevent a greater harm to the public.
- A government action harms a few people but protects the community.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 1.7.18 — The law would rather tolerate a private loss than a public evil. — Co. Litt. 152 (Lex citius tolerare vult privatum damnum quam publicum malum.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →