Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 1.5.361

One who grants a thing is presumed to grant also whatever is essential to its use.

Cuicunque aliquis quid concedit, concedere videtur et id sine quo res ipsa esse non potest.

Source: Sterricker v. Dickinson, 9 Barb. 518; Troup v. Hurlbut, 10 Id. 359; People v. Hicks, 15 Id. 160; Seymour v. Canandaigua R.R. Co., 25 Id. 310; Wharton, III-B-13 Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

A grant of land surrounded by the grantor's other land implies a right of way over that land. A corporate charter implies the power to make by-laws. Whatever is necessary to enjoy what was granted is considered granted as well.

Where this applies

  • A developer grants a homebuyer a lot in the middle of the developer's larger parcel, and the grant implicitly includes a right of way across the developer's land to reach the public road.
  • A franchisor grants a franchisee the right to operate a branded restaurant, and the grant necessarily includes the right to use the brand's proprietary recipes, signage, and marketing materials.
  • A state grants a water utility the right to serve a county, and the grant impliedly includes the power to lay pipes under public roads because the utility cannot function without them.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 1.5.361 — One who grants a thing is presumed to grant also whatever is essential to its use. — Sterricker v. Dickinson, 9 Barb. 518; Troup v. Hurlbut, 10 Id. 359; People v. Hicks, 15 Id. 160; Seymour v. Canandaigua R.R. Co., 25 Id. 310; Wharton, III-B-13 (Cuicunque aliquis quid concedit, concedere videtur et id sine quo res ipsa esse non potest.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →