Maxim 1.5.341
Things which individually do not avail, taken together are helpful.
Quae singula non prosunt, juncta juvant.
Source: Hendricks v. Robinson; Wharton, III-261
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
Pieces of evidence that are individually insufficient may collectively establish a fact — the whole is greater than the sum of its parts in matters of proof.
Where this applies
- Three separate witnesses each saw a small part of a crime, and while no single witness can identify the perpetrator, their combined testimony establishes the defendant's presence, motive, and opportunity.
- Several pieces of circumstantial evidence — a fingerprint, a motive, and a timeline — are each insufficient standing alone, but taken together they support a conviction.
- A plaintiff presents multiple documents, each proving only a fragment of a contract's terms, but collectively they demonstrate the existence and full scope of the agreement.
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 1.5.341 — Things which individually do not avail, taken together are helpful. — Hendricks v. Robinson; Wharton, III-261 (Quae singula non prosunt, juncta juvant.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →