Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 1.5.341

Things which individually do not avail, taken together are helpful.

Quae singula non prosunt, juncta juvant.

Source: Hendricks v. Robinson; Wharton, III-261 Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate

Explanation

Pieces of evidence that are individually insufficient may collectively establish a fact — the whole is greater than the sum of its parts in matters of proof.

Where this applies

  • Three separate witnesses each saw a small part of a crime, and while no single witness can identify the perpetrator, their combined testimony establishes the defendant's presence, motive, and opportunity.
  • Several pieces of circumstantial evidence — a fingerprint, a motive, and a timeline — are each insufficient standing alone, but taken together they support a conviction.
  • A plaintiff presents multiple documents, each proving only a fragment of a contract's terms, but collectively they demonstrate the existence and full scope of the agreement.

Legal domains

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 1.5.341 — Things which individually do not avail, taken together are helpful. — Hendricks v. Robinson; Wharton, III-261 (Quae singula non prosunt, juncta juvant.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →