Maxim 1.4.15
A court of equity ought to do justice completely and not by halves.
Source: Rice & Adams Corp. v. Lathrop, 278 U.S. 509, 515; Weisman, 36a
Difficulty 3/5 — Intermediate
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) When equity takes jurisdiction of a cause, it must grant complete relief — a court cannot resolve part of the dispute and leave the rest, as half-justice is no justice at all.
Where this applies
- A court grants a divorce but refuses to divide the marital property, and the appellate court reverses because equity must resolve the entire matter, not leave it half-done.
- A judge orders a company to stop polluting a river but declines to order cleanup of the existing contamination, and the higher court rules that equity requires complete relief.
- A court rules that a trustee breached his duty but refuses to order an accounting of the missing funds, and the appellate court holds that doing justice by halves is no justice at all.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 1.4.15 — A court of equity ought to do justice completely and not by halves. — Rice & Adams Corp. v. Lathrop, 278 U.S. 509, 515; Weisman, 36a
Found an error? Suggest a correction →