Maxim 6.3.28
In the contract of loan, a stipulation not to be liable for fraud is not valid.
Source: Dig. 13, 7, 17, pr; Weisman, 24kk
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) A borrower cannot contractually exempt himself from liability for fraud in the loan — the law will not enforce a clause that shields a party from the consequences of his own deceit.
Where this applies
- A borrower includes a clause in a loan agreement saying he is not liable if he commits fraud, and the court strikes the clause as void against public policy.
- A lender and borrower agree that neither party can be held responsible for fraudulent misrepresentations in the loan documents — the court refuses to enforce that provision.
- A payday lender's contract includes fine print releasing the lender from all fraud liability, and a court holds that clause unenforceable because you cannot contract away liability for your own deceit.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 6.3.28 — In the contract of loan, a stipulation not to be liable for fraud is not valid. — Dig. 13, 7, 17, pr; Weisman, 24kk
Found an error? Suggest a correction →