Maxim 5.7.4
Where two conflicting clauses are found in a will, the last shall stand.
Cum duo inter se pugnantia reperiuntur in testamento, ultimum ratum est.
Source: Co. Litt. 112b; Shep. Touch. 451; Broom, Max. 583; Wharton, Legal Maxims, Max. 25; Weisman, 103b; Weisman, 103q
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
The later clause prevails on the assumption that it represents the testator's final mind — the earlier, inconsistent provision is deemed revoked.
Where this applies
- My mother's will says one thing in paragraph 3 and the opposite in paragraph 7 — which controls?
- Two provisions in the same will contradict each other about who gets the house.
Topics
Legal domains
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 5.7.4 — Where two conflicting clauses are found in a will, the last shall stand. — Co. Litt. 112b; Shep. Touch. 451; Broom, Max. 583; Wharton, Legal Maxims, Max. 25; Weisman, 103b; Weisman, 103q (Cum duo inter se pugnantia reperiuntur in testamento, ultimum ratum est.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →