Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 5.7.4

Where two conflicting clauses are found in a will, the last shall stand.

Cum duo inter se pugnantia reperiuntur in testamento, ultimum ratum est.

Source: Co. Litt. 112b; Shep. Touch. 451; Broom, Max. 583; Wharton, Legal Maxims, Max. 25; Weisman, 103b; Weisman, 103q Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable

Explanation

The later clause prevails on the assumption that it represents the testator's final mind — the earlier, inconsistent provision is deemed revoked.

Where this applies

  • My mother's will says one thing in paragraph 3 and the opposite in paragraph 7 — which controls?
  • Two provisions in the same will contradict each other about who gets the house.

Legal domains

See also

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 5.7.4 — Where two conflicting clauses are found in a will, the last shall stand. — Co. Litt. 112b; Shep. Touch. 451; Broom, Max. 583; Wharton, Legal Maxims, Max. 25; Weisman, 103b; Weisman, 103q (Cum duo inter se pugnantia reperiuntur in testamento, ultimum ratum est.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →