Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 5.7.20

What avails in the lesser will avail in the greater; and what does not avail in the greater will not avail in the lesser.

Quod in minori valet valebit in majori; et quod in majori non valet nec valebit in minori.

Source: Co. Litt. 260; Jackson; Weisman, 95k Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable

Explanation

The argument from lesser to greater (and vice versa) is a fundamental rule of legal reasoning — what holds for a smaller matter holds a fortiori for a larger one.

Where this applies

  • If this argument works for a small claim, shouldn't it work even more so for a larger one?
  • A legal principle that applies to a minor case should apply with even greater force to a major one.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 5.7.20 — What avails in the lesser will avail in the greater; and what does not avail in the greater will not avail in the lesser. — Co. Litt. 260; Jackson; Weisman, 95k (Quod in minori valet valebit in majori; et quod in majori non valet nec valebit in minori.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →