Maxim 5.6.19
Not right, but seisin (legal possession), makes a stock from which the inheritance must descend.
Source: Fleta, 1.6, cc. 14, 2, s. 2; Noy, Max. 9th ed. 72, n. (b); Broom, Max. 466; 2 Bl. Comm. 388, 389; Weisman, 58d; Weisman, 91gg
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
(English-origin maxim.) Inheritance descends from the person who was actually seised (in legal possession), not merely from one who had a right of entry or a bare right — seisin, not abstract right, is the root of descent.
Where this applies
- A man had a legal right to inherit a manor but never took physical possession of it — his children cannot claim descent through him because seisin, not mere right, is the root of inheritance.
- Two branches of a family dispute who inherits a parcel of land, and the court awards it to the branch whose ancestor actually held seisin at death, not the branch whose ancestor merely had a claim.
- An heir argues his father had a right to a piece of land, but since the father never actually possessed it, the son cannot inherit through him.
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 5.6.19 — Not right, but seisin (legal possession), makes a stock from which the inheritance must descend. — Fleta, 1.6, cc. 14, 2, s. 2; Noy, Max. 9th ed. 72, n. (b); Broom, Max. 466; 2 Bl. Comm. 388, 389; Weisman, 58d; Weisman, 91gg
Found an error? Suggest a correction →