Skip to content
NeCede's

Maxim 5.4.11

A gift is not presumed.

Donatio non praesumitur.

Source: Jenk. Cent. 109; Jackson; Weisman, 48q Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable

Explanation

The law does not presume that a transfer of property was intended as a gift — a gift must be proven by clear evidence of donative intent and delivery.

Where this applies

  • A man loans his lawnmower to a neighbor, and the neighbor later claims it was a gift — the law does not presume a gift, so the neighbor must prove with clear evidence that the owner intended to give it away permanently.
  • A woman deposits money into her adult son's bank account to help with an emergency, and the son claims the money was a gift when she asks for it back — without clear evidence of donative intent, the law presumes it was not a gift.
  • A business partner transfers equipment to the other partner's warehouse for storage, and the recipient claims it was gifted to the partnership — the law requires proof of intent to give, not just proof of delivery.

Legal domains

Cite this maxim

NeCede Max. 5.4.11 — A gift is not presumed. — Jenk. Cent. 109; Jackson; Weisman, 48q (Donatio non praesumitur.)

Found an error? Suggest a correction →