Maxim 5.3.6
It is settled that that place is to be considered the home of each man where he has his habitation and has established his business.
Domus est constitutum habitaculum.
Source: Dig. 50.16.203; Arnold v. United Ins. Co., 1 Johns. Cas. (N.Y.) 363, 366; Weisman, 54b
Difficulty 2/5 — Approachable
Explanation
Domicile is fixed by habitation and intent — where a man dwells and keeps his accounts, there the law considers him at home.
Where this applies
- A zoning board says my home doesn't qualify as a residence because only one person lives there.
- The government is defining 'household' in a way that excludes my living arrangement.
See also
Cite this maxim
NeCede Max. 5.3.6 — It is settled that that place is to be considered the home of each man where he has his habitation and has established his business. — Dig. 50.16.203; Arnold v. United Ins. Co., 1 Johns. Cas. (N.Y.) 363, 366; Weisman, 54b (Domus est constitutum habitaculum.)
Found an error? Suggest a correction →